95 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
95 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
|
aproba
|
||
|
======
|
||
|
|
||
|
A ridiculously light-weight function argument validator
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
var validate = require("aproba")
|
||
|
|
||
|
function myfunc(a, b, c) {
|
||
|
// `a` must be a string, `b` a number, `c` a function
|
||
|
validate('SNF', arguments) // [a,b,c] is also valid
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
myfunc('test', 23, function () {}) // ok
|
||
|
myfunc(123, 23, function () {}) // type error
|
||
|
myfunc('test', 23) // missing arg error
|
||
|
myfunc('test', 23, function () {}, true) // too many args error
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
Valid types are:
|
||
|
|
||
|
| type | description
|
||
|
| :--: | :----------
|
||
|
| * | matches any type
|
||
|
| A | `Array.isArray` OR an `arguments` object
|
||
|
| S | typeof == string
|
||
|
| N | typeof == number
|
||
|
| F | typeof == function
|
||
|
| O | typeof == object and not type A and not type E
|
||
|
| B | typeof == boolean
|
||
|
| E | `instanceof Error` OR `null` **(special: see below)**
|
||
|
| Z | == `null`
|
||
|
|
||
|
Validation failures throw one of three exception types, distinguished by a
|
||
|
`code` property of `EMISSINGARG`, `EINVALIDTYPE` or `ETOOMANYARGS`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you pass in an invalid type then it will throw with a code of
|
||
|
`EUNKNOWNTYPE`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If an **error** argument is found and is not null then the remaining
|
||
|
arguments are optional. That is, if you say `ESO` then that's like using a
|
||
|
non-magical `E` in: `E|ESO|ZSO`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### But I have optional arguments?!
|
||
|
|
||
|
You can provide more than one signature by separating them with pipes `|`.
|
||
|
If any signature matches the arguments then they'll be considered valid.
|
||
|
|
||
|
So for example, say you wanted to write a signature for
|
||
|
`fs.createWriteStream`. The docs for it describe it thusly:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
fs.createWriteStream(path[, options])
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
This would be a signature of `SO|S`. That is, a string and and object, or
|
||
|
just a string.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Now, if you read the full `fs` docs, you'll see that actually path can ALSO
|
||
|
be a buffer. And options can be a string, that is:
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
path <String> | <Buffer>
|
||
|
options <String> | <Object>
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
To reproduce this you have to fully enumerate all of the possible
|
||
|
combinations and that implies a signature of `SO|SS|OO|OS|S|O`. The
|
||
|
awkwardness is a feature: It reminds you of the complexity you're adding to
|
||
|
your API when you do this sort of thing.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Browser support
|
||
|
|
||
|
This has no dependencies and should work in browsers, though you'll have
|
||
|
noisier stack traces.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Why this exists
|
||
|
|
||
|
I wanted a very simple argument validator. It needed to do two things:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Be more concise and easier to use than assertions
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Not encourage an infinite bikeshed of DSLs
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is why types are specified by a single character and there's no such
|
||
|
thing as an optional argument.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is not intended to validate user data. This is specifically about
|
||
|
asserting the interface of your functions.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you need greater validation, I encourage you to write them by hand or
|
||
|
look elsewhere.
|
||
|
|