Option to Disable Reconnected Notification #21

New Issue

Ghost · 2022-07-17T21:49:20Z

Ghost commented

2022-07-17 21:49:20 +00:00

Would we be able to get an option through itctl to disable the "Successfully reconnected" notification? My Pinetime and Pinephone reconnect to each other a lot and it's not really a useful notification in my use case.

Elara6331 commented

2022-07-20 02:19:25 +00:00

There is already an option in the ITD config. You can edit /etc/itd.toml or create a new config at ~/.config/itd/itd.toml. Either way, you will need to set on.reconnect.notify to false, which looks like this in the config:

[on.reconnect]
    notify = false
    setTime = true

Because this already exists, I will close this issue. Please comment if you have any questions.

There is already an option in the ITD config. You can edit `/etc/itd.toml` or create a new config at `~/.config/itd/itd.toml`. Either way, you will need to set `on.reconnect.notify` to `false`, which looks like this in the config: ```toml [on.reconnect] notify = false setTime = true ``` Because this already exists, I will close this issue. Please comment if you have any questions.

Elara6331 closed this issue

2022-07-20 02:19:25 +00:00

Elara6331 added the

Wontfix

label 2022-07-20 02:19:46 +00:00

Ghost commented

2022-07-21 23:53:59 +00:00

There is already an option in the ITD config. You can edit /etc/itd.toml or create a new config at ~/.config/itd/itd.toml. Either way, you will need to set on.reconnect.notify to false, which looks like this in the config:
[on.reconnect]
    notify = false
    setTime = true
Because this already exists, I will close this issue. Please comment if you have any questions.

Ah okay, thank you! I didn't see it documented anywhere

> There is already an option in the ITD config. You can edit `/etc/itd.toml` or create a new config at `~/.config/itd/itd.toml`. Either way, you will need to set `on.reconnect.notify` to `false`, which looks like this in the config: > > ```toml > [on.reconnect] > notify = false > setTime = true > ``` > > Because this already exists, I will close this issue. Please comment if you have any questions. Ah okay, thank you! I didn't see it documented anywhere

Sign in to join this conversation.